This seminar from the Seminars for Excellence in Teaching (SET) series introduces Specifications Grading—an innovative assessment model that shifts the focus from "earning points" to mastering learning objectives. Guest speaker Dr. Sarah Dai (Baylor University) shares her experience implementing this system to reduce student anxiety and foster a growth mindset.
The presentation details several core components of the model, including:
- Grade Bundles: Groups of assignments linked to specific final letter grades (A, B, or C). This provides students with clear choices and agency over their academic trajectory based on the level of challenge they wish to take on.
- Tokens: A flexible "currency" system that allows students to revise unsatisfactory work, submit late assignments, or excuse absences. This creates a safety net that encourages risk-taking and learning from failure.
- Clear Specifications: Detailed, binary criteria (satisfactory/unsatisfactory) that an assignment must meet to receive credit. Work is either "up to spec" or requires revision, ensuring students meet high professional standards.
- Feedback and Revision: The model emphasizes the iterative process. By requiring students to address specific feedback in their revisions, the focus moves from a one-time product to long-term formative growth.
The discussion highlights that successful assessment is not about rigid rubrics, but about incentivizing effort and curiosity. By treating grading as a transparent contract, faculty can promote intrinsic motivation and intellectual courage.
The key takeaway is that specifications grading transforms the classroom into a space where students feel safe to experiment, leading to higher-quality work and a more sustainable teaching experience for faculty.